万能's profile错乱の年轮BlogListsGuestbook Tools Help

Blog


    汉人不懂音乐

    某南方选秀节目的负面风云人物终于被淘汰,当晚看了这个关键的重播,加以零零散散断断续续的某几个评委对其的评价,我终于忍不住打破我之前为我博客定下的潜规则“不追、不捧、不拾人牙慧”。那么正题开始,以某个评委的点评开始:

    “……你歌词的创作能力实在是太强了……”

    我总与理解起来为什么这般人类可以火,因为中国人(此处特指汉族)听歌和听音乐是完全两码事。音乐首先有三个很重要的元素,比如绘画点、线、面,这刚好对应音乐有节奏、旋律、和声,点对应节奏,线对应旋律,和声则对应面。我们先来看美国的黑人音乐R&B,是节奏为主旋律为辅,没有和声;中国汉族的音乐刚好与之相反,旋律为主,节奏为辅一样没有和声,而欧洲的节奏、旋律、和声他们相辅相成比较平衡,这三个直接代表了他们每一个民族音乐进步的程度。

    对于大多数中国人音乐的旋律是最重要的,如果你只给他听节奏没有旋律基本不会有人接受,你给他听苏柏教堂的和声他们听不懂,就如若干年前有一个印象非常深刻的新闻,某丹麦著名男女和声表演引来台下嘘声阵阵,以至于演员差点无法正常进行表演,更能打动他们的仅仅是旋律,比如戏曲只要一个单旋律,其他都可以不要,而西方则绝对不可能。所以音乐本来必须要有的元素,随着社会的发展需要变成了目前我们的审美。

    当然这上面说的都是听音乐,那么听歌呢?这就到了我本文的主题“汉族人不懂音乐”为什么这样讲?汉人音乐的最鼎盛时期的是唐宋,而我们常常吟诵的宋词便是当时唱来听的,而词牌名则是这首词的曲调,一首《虞美人》就可以填三千多首词,所以当时的文人骚客对于歌曲的欣赏只是内容也就是歌词,对于曲调基本可以毫无要求。

    不过这说的都是古人,现代人呢?看看那首火的大街小巷的《两只蝴蝶》和最近争议无限的《狮子座》都是一个“咚咚锵、咚咚锵”的秧歌调毫无节奏可言,听者却悠然自得,这不全因为他们听歌得只是歌词,想到这里我便可以坦然接受曾某人不可理解的爆红——汉人听歌只听歌词……


    没想到Google竟然为我保存了这篇文章,感谢啊

    Comments

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.
    万能 王 has turned off comments on this page.

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://wpaengd.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C3E2975D951CF333!973.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None